Hannibal, Carthage, and History’s First White on Black Genocide #RealBlackHistory


Hannibal Pic Hannibal, Carthage, and History’s First White on Black Genocide #RealBlackHistory

Hannibal of Carthage, One of the Baddest Black Men in #RealBlackHistory

Hannibal of Carthage was one of the baddest Black men to come out of Africa. His military conquests are still the stuff of legend more than 2,000 years later. Most Black men and women have never heard of Hannibal, and those who have do not realize that he was as Black as the soil of the Nile. While white folks mentally masturbate over movies like 300 and Troy, the story of one of the most epic military geniuses of all times goes untold. Until now.

The African Kingdom of Carthage

Carthage Phoenician city Hannibal, Carthage, and History’s First White on Black Genocide #RealBlackHistory

An artist's rendition of the City of Carthage

The city-state of Carthage was founded on the North African coast in 814 BC by a mixed population of the survivors of the Saharan ecological collapse and the Nubians (meaning the people of Carthage were Black as hell). Anthropologists argue that the people of Carthage were actually Phonecians, but genetic evidence suggests otherwise. The Carthaginians were no more Phonecian than the Ancient Egyptians were Arab. The Kingdom was a matriarchal one – meaning women held authority. The Carthaginian Republic grew to become the longest-lived and largest state in the ancient Mediterranean. By 600 B.C., Carthage had become self-governing, reached the height of its power, and was a Mediterranean powerhouse. The land was rich in gold, ivory, and salt, and the people of Carthage were skilled shipbuilders, tradesmen, and merchants who knew commerce.

Greece and Rome, greedy for control of Carthage’s resources and trade routes, constantly struggled with Carthage over territory. Although the Carthaginians refused to enter armed conflict and insisted on an agreement with the Greeks, the Greeks ignored the truce and invaded Carthage in a sneak attack around 310 B.C.

To regain their sovereignty, Carthage fought four brutal wars against Greece and Rome – driving out the Greeks in the first war in 306 B.C. The Romans stepped in to pick up where Greece left off in 264 B.C. – launching three “Punic Wars” against Carthage. Like most wars, White powers hungry for natural resources and riches unleashed atrocities against Black men that where unprecedented. The defeat of Carthage in the First Punic War gave Rome complete control of the Mediterranean sea.

It was in response to this white aggression that one of the baddest Black men to ever live rose up to bring Rome to the brink of destruction. n an age where wars and conflicts lasted decades, Hannibal’s army had all but annihilated Rome in only 2 short years after beginning his campaign. His was one of the most epic military campaigns ever launched, and was so intelligently executed that tacticians still study his technical and tactical proficiency.

Hannibal’s father, Hamilcar Barca, was the leading Carthaginian commander and his brothers were all commanders during the during the First Punic War. Hannibal was determined to succeed where they had failed with a superior military strategy.

Hannibal’s Military Strategy

Hannibal invasion map Hannibal, Carthage, and History’s First White on Black Genocide #RealBlackHistory

I swear so soon as age will permit…I will use fire and steel to arrest the destiny of Rome.” – Hannibal

While preparing for war, Hannibal developed a strategy based on the fact that Rome had complete control of the oceans. This meant instead of being able to take ships straight across the Mediterranean and attack Rome from the East, he would have to take his troops along the most difficult and unsuspected route; through France (Gaul) over the Alps and attack Rome from the North. Since the Romans believed the Alps were impossible to pass an army through, they would be taken completely by surprise.

The only animals capable of surviving the journey was the African elephant, and so with 40,000 foot soldiers, 5,000 war elephants,  and 12,000 horsemen Hannibal made the trek. To keep his army together through what was to be a miserable march into Rome, Hannibal ruthlessly exploited the strengths, weaknesses, and self interests of the men that he led; at times promising the riches of Italy to one group, and at other times promising death for failure to another group. His psychological strategy worked – a year after starting out, Hannibal had lost more than half his men during the march, but still managed to surprise and defeat a well fed, well organized Roman infantry at the Battle of Trebbia in Northern Rome.

Hannibal didn’t let time or his laziness get the best of him; he quickly moved to Cannae, where he surprised the Romans yet again, and turned the strength of the Roman battle formation into a weakness using an envelopment tactic. He encircled the square unit which eliminated the Roman numerical advantage by shrinking the surface area where combat could occur. In other words, the men inside the square could do nothing while the men on the outer sides had to fight off attacks. Whenever the square formation would try to charge through one side of the circle, Hannibal’s troops would move, open up, and encircle them once again. As a result, even though Hannibal’s force was inferior to that of his foe, he won. Hannibal’s army managed to surround and kill or capture nearly 70,000 Romans. In battle after battle, Hannibal defeated a much larger and more sophisticated military by understanding the strengths, weaknesses, and the environment of all the parties involved. He knew the minds and hearts of the people he fought for, with, and against.

Hannibal’s vision of military affairs, derived from experience gained alongside his father, stretched over most of the Greco-Roman world of his time. His vision gave rise to his grand strategy of conquering Rome by opening a northern front and subduing allied city-states on the peninsula rather than by attacking Rome directly – a kind of proxy war. The alpine invasion of Italy was a military operation that would shake the Mediterranean World of 218 BC with repercussions for more than two decades. It was a world war in the sense that it involved about three-quarters of the population of the entire Punic-Greco-Roman world and few people living in the Mediterranean were able to escape it. Virtually every family in Rome lost a member or members in the swath of destruction brought down on them by Hannibal and his Carthaginian armies.

Rome took a page from Hannibal’s playbook and invaded Carthage in 203 BC. The action placed Hannibal’s homeland in dire threat, and he was recalled from Rome to ward off the new threat. His arrival immediately restored the dominance of Carthage’s national guard, which placed him in command. The war was so savage and both sides so decimated that by 202 BC, both sides were suing for peace. Negotiations were shaky due to Roman allegations of “Punic Faith,” referring to the war-like nature of the North Africans. (Keep in mind, Greece and Rome attacked CARTHAGE first!!)

Rome and Carthage worked out a peace plan whereby Carthage could keep its African territory but would lose its overseas empire. Also, Carthage was to reduce its fleet and pay a war restitution to Rome. But when Carthage captured a stranded Roman fleet in the Gulf of Tunes and stripped it of supplies, negotiations fell apart. Rumors had it that the Romans actually set up the stranded fleet to provoke the Carthaginians. Fearing that war was about to pop off again, Hannibal returned to Rome with his army. The decisive battle at Zama soon followed, and Hannibal was finally defeated.

Hannibal is Defeated

Hannibal Invasion Routes Hannibal, Carthage, and History’s First White on Black Genocide #RealBlackHistory

The Four Phases of the Second Punic War

Once Hannibal had been defeated, Rome totally invaded Carthage – Rome decided that a military victory wasn’t crushing enough. It pronounced a curse on the ancient city, and dispatched mercenaries to kill every man, woman, and child within the city walls. Priests sprinkled salt over the fertile Carthaginian soil so that no plant would grow, and no animal could drink the ground water. The Romans completely destroyed the culture, writings, and technology of Carthage, leaving behind nothing but ashes and sand.

According to scholar Cheik Anta Diop, the Romans gave themselves permission to commit atrocities with propaganda. The destroyed people deserved their fate because they where impious, sinister, lustful, and incapable of promoting progress. Romans were encouraged to forget Carthage, and later generations were taught that the Carthaginians – not the Romans – were the real savages. By twisting the story around, Rome could go on with a clear conscience

The brutal destruction of the entire ethnic group that was Carthage would be the first in a long line of white savagery.


Have You Read These Yet?

MAKE A CHOICE. TAKE A STAND.

JOIN THE MOVEMENT BY SUBSCRIBING BELOW.  GET ACCESS TO RESTRICTED PARTS OF THIS WEBSITE, FREE BOOKS AND DVDS AND INSIDER INFORMATION!



  

  • http://www.h2comms.net/ Will

    Wow, that's heavy, you know what is also very sad. I was telling a friend about this and when I said Hannibal their mind went to an old cannibalistic eastern European man. How skewed our view is.

    • http://unitedblackamerica.com Asad

      Lol, I appreciate all the comments youve left in the past – including this one! I think there should be a movie made about the brotha. Entertainment seems to influence our education (or motivation towards it) more than anything else. If there was a movie as epic as 300 on Hannibal, best believe all of us would be talking about him.

    • Another Guy

      Sorry to say guys, but Northern people of Africa ARE NOT BLACK!

      Take a trip and you will see they range from not very good looking Arabs to semi-good looking Persians.

      • http://unitedblackamerica.com Asad

        The people you see in their current locations are NOT always the indigenous people of an area.

        Ok, take a trip to Egypt and look at the people that are currently there. Now compare those invaders with the SELF PORTRAITS the people of Ancient Egypt made of themselves.

        Come to America and look at the population here. Now travel back in time 400 years and take a look around.

        Archaeological evidence supports this fact.

        • Eva

          Carthage was NOT destroyed after the 2nd Punic war. It prospered another 60 years. Phoenicians, who founded Carthage were from the Middle East and did NOT want to mix with the locals. Hannibal was a brilliant general, but lousy in long term strategy – he did not have one. He thought that the Roman subjects are as oppressed as the Carthaginian subjects. However, that was not true, they were mostly incorporated in Res Publica, and barely a few deserted the Romans in their hour of need. Of course, this note probably does not fit in some weird version of false history. Do you really need to pretend?

          • http://unitedblackamerica.com Asad

            Carthage was destroyed after the Third Punic War, which is exactly what we wrote here. Phonecians werent from the Middle East any more than the Ancient Egyptians were. Melanin tests have proven that. Middle Easternenrs wre only able to sweep into North Africa after 200 B.C. or so. Hannibals loing term strategy was non-existent, he only wanted to destroy the Roman aggressors. Therefore, his lack of a long-term vision was understandable. If my history is so false, please tell me why white historians have corroborated it? Thanks for the comment!

  • Eva

    Hannibal went out of his way (being in Spain) to invade Italy. That sounds like an aggressor to me. "Once Hannibal was defeated, the Romans invaded Carthage"uou wrote. Actually, the 2nd Punic war, which they started, continued on their soil. After Hannibal was defeated in battle of Zama, nothing happened to the city. They made peace with the Romans.

    The 3rd Punic war happened after nearly 60 years, Hannibal and P. Cornelius Scipio were long dead and a different politics emerged in the Roman SPQR.

  • Sid

    Vin Diesel is supposed to be making a movie about Hannibal. I'm glad someone is making the movie. It will be interesting to see what the Carthaginians will look like as far as the racial make up.

    • http://unitedblackamerica.com Asad

      I dont know if Im feeling Vin Diesel as Hannibal. I was thinking Rick Ross (lol)

  • adisa

    um..no.

    1. Hannibal wasn't black. He was Semitic. Carthaginian were people from Lebanon (which was Phoenicia back thn)

    2. You didn't write "Carthage were destroy after the 3rd Punic war. You wrote "Rome totally invade Carthage and destroy the city after Hunnibal was defeated" Of course, technically, it was after Hannibal was defeated for 60 years. But the way you wrote it is just misleading.

    And no salt were sprinkle or sowed in to the ground. It was a myth, or a story that just make things seems cooler.

    3. I think the Roman did excuse Carthaginian as being lots of things, including sacrificing children in ritual. True or not I don't know, there's not enough of Carthage to proof anything. The Romans didn't try to forget Carthage either. Virgil, a Roman poet even write an Epic poem involving Carthage, the Aeneid.

    4. The Romans went back to build a city on top of the ruins. and they called it Carthago Nova or New Carthage.

    5. By twisting the story around, you can try to bastardize the Romans in the way that they weren't guilty.

    I'm not saying they were not savages and the Carthaginian were savages. It's the nature of War.

    6. This really has nothing to do with black and white. The reason the Romans destroy Carthage were interpret by many historian as "they are afraid that Carthage will destroy them, or be in their way of expanding their territory" and they also afraid of Hannibal for pretty much eternity.

    7. The peace treaty that robbed Carthage of her armies and fleet were AFTER Zama. The reason for 3rd Punic war was because Carthage was in a conflict with near by country and had to fight. Rome took this opportunity to excuse Carthage of breaking their promise and invaded.

    never mind me, But please don't do the same thing you're excusing other people of doing. And do you homework right. I'm not a historian, but I do read too.

    • http://unitedblackamerica.com Asad

      Thanks for building on the conversation HOWEVER, keep the condescension to yourself. We dont take kindly to disrespect.
      1 – Can you offer proof that the people that inhabited the region were Semitic? How did a people that originated in southwestern Asia JUMP OVER Kemet and Sudan (then Nubia) and magically land in Carthage? Why are there no traces of the Semitic language anywhere in the region? I would have believed you more if you had said the poeple of old Ethopia or Axum werent Black, but Carthage? They were no more Semetic than the men who build Egypt. – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic

      2-You wrote "By twisting the story around, you can try to bastardize the Romans in the way that they weren’t guilty.
      I’m not saying they were not savages and the Carthaginian were savages. It’s the nature of War." I have a bad habit of calling it like I see it. I see a nation subjecting aother nation illegally – first via usury and detention, and later via outright aggression. There is nothing "twisted" about what is written. The story of Carthage underlines white aggression, a topic that should be brought to light and addressed if it is to be resolved.

      3. The Romans did indeed build a new city over the city they destroyed. Thats how they get down. Why are you presenting that as a point of contention? Again, this just demonstrates that white imperialism was alive and well even back then.

      4. I dont do the same thing I accuse others of doing. Im not trying to invade Rome. Im trying to liberate Africa and Africans BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

      Thanks for taking the time to comment, just make sure you are keeping it respectful.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jordi.vissers Jordi Vissers

    You do realise that what you tell is mostly not true. Just a few examples.

    1: Carthage was by defenition a Phonecians. If you stay away from you’re home for hundreds of years and meanwhile get children with the local nubians it is completly normal that dna is not a 100% Phonician anymore.

    2: Carthage started the First punic war. It came to the aid of Messana, but instead of leaving it after the battle, they took the citie. This was an direct insult to the romans and had only 1 purpose. Getting the war with the Romans.

    3: The Greeks have not played a significant role in the three punic wars. The only greeks involved were the southern Italian citiestates who were under roman controle.

    4: The Romans knew Hannibal Barca was crossing the Alps, and there was no suprise at Trebia. It would be an insult to the great Militairy leader Hannibal to claim so.

    5: You completly forget to tell about the battle near lake Trasimene, where Hannibal butchered 20.000 romans and a Consul.

    6: The succesfull counterstrategy of fabius is completly ignored.

    7: Rome does not counter the defeat near Cannae with an invasion of Carthage, they invade spain under the command of Scipio Africanus.

    Since you have no clue on how the war ended, il tell you.

    Hannibal is stuck in Italy. The reinforcements of Hasdrubal are dead and the Councel will not help. Then the Romans invade North Africa and defeat the forces of Carthage. Now the Cartheginian senate recalls Hannibal. At Zama (which lies in Africa, not in Italy for gods sake) Hannibal gets beaten by Scipio Africanus. ONLY AFTER ZAMA there is peace between Rome and Carthage. Carthage does not get destroyed for another 50 years in a third war. This third war is the only one truly provoked by the Romans, but not with an stranded fleet….

    What truly happend is that Nubians attack Carthage, and Carthage declares war. This was not allowed by the Roman peace treaty and use it as an excuse to destroy Carthage as it was know. IT IS NOT burned to the ground and the soult thing is just a legend. What really happend is that they destroyed 90% of the city, but kept a settlement there to use the great economical advantages carthage had in the past.

    and last but not least. We do not know the skin colour of any of the Barca’s. so please dont assume things.

    I love that you are a fan of Hannibal Barca. I personaly think he is the second most genius militairy commander ever to have lived. His Genius is undeniable and the word Annihilate has been founded in the honour of his victory in Carthage, but atleast check the facts.

    A history student from The Netherlands

hostgator coupon